Products conceived for recovery from the start: monomaterials, separable joints and a recyclable construction. Recyclability is decided in development – not at the sorting plant.
At a glance
Design for recycling describes the recyclable design of plastic products: a product is constructed so that, at end of life, it can be collected single-material and recovered as a material. The central levers are monomaterials instead of composites, detachable instead of bonded joints, avoiding disruptive coatings, and clear material marking per ISO 11469. Semadeni already accounts for these criteria in product development and orients itself on recognised design guidelines such as the RecyClass criteria. Because function, regulatory requirements and recyclability occasionally conflict, we weigh them per product and application – rather than claiming recyclability across the board.
Two routes to recyclability
What are you looking for?
Development & engineering
I am developing a product and want it designed for recycling
We check early which material, which joining technique and which marking your part can carry – mono-material instead of composite, detachable instead of bonded joints, marking per ISO 11469.
The PPWR requires recyclable packaging from 2030. We document material and marking; assessing recyclability itself remains product-specific and is not given as a blanket assurance.
Later recoverability is largely set already in construction. We therefore start early: monomaterials instead of composites, mechanical joints instead of bonding, and a material marking that eases sorting and reprocessing.
Monomaterials: PP, PE-HD, PET – single-material recoverable
Avoiding coatings and lacquers that disrupt recycling
Material marking per ISO 11469 on suitable mouldings
Screwed instead of bonded joints for disassembly
Construction principles
Four levers for recyclable products
Monomaterial
One material instead of a composite – a PP container with a PP lid rather than a material mix. Single-material purity is the basis for high-grade recycling.
Separability
Detachable instead of bonded joints, so components can be separated at end of life without tools or with simple tools.
Marking
Material marking per ISO 11469 eases sorting and reprocessing in the recycling chain. Expected to apply until August 2028 – the PPWR marking then takes over.
Avoid disruptors
No incompatible label adhesives, coatings or dark pigments that impair sorting and recyclate quality.
In practice
What we implement – and where the limits lie
Recyclable design is always a trade-off: some functions or regulatory requirements call
for materials or joints that run counter to pure recyclability. We make the trade-off
transparent and decide per product.
What we implement
PP container with PP lid – fully monomaterial-compliant
PE-HD canister without disruptive pigments for higher-grade recycling
RecyClass criteria as a guideline in product development
Material marking per ISO 11469 as standard
What remains a trade-off
Barrier or safety functions may require composites
Regulatory requirements (e.g. dangerous goods) restrict material choice
Colour and design wishes sometimes oppose sortability
Recyclability also depends on the local collection infrastructure
Design for recycling means shaping a plastic product from the construction stage so that, at end of life, it can be collected single-material and recovered as a material. The focus is on monomaterials, separable joints, recycling-compatible colours and clear material marking.
Which construction principles are decisive?
Four levers matter: a single material where possible (monomaterial) instead of a composite, detachable rather than bonded joints for disassembly, avoiding disruptive coatings and label adhesives, and material marking per ISO 11469. Which solution fits depends on function and application.
Why are monomaterials more recyclable?
Single-material plastics are markedly easier to separate after collection and to reprocess into high-grade recyclate. Material composites – different plastics, or plastic-metal combinations – must be separated at high effort and more often end up in thermal recovery. We therefore prefer PP-on-PP or PE-on-PE.
Does Semadeni advise on recyclable product development?
Yes. We bring recyclability into development from the start – from material choice through joining technology to marking. Recognised design guidelines such as the RecyClass criteria serve as orientation. The concrete trade-off between function, standard and recyclability is resolved per product.
Does design for recycling also include recyclate use?
Both belong to the loop but are not the same: design for recycling ensures a product is well recoverable at the end; recyclate use employs already reprocessed material in the new product. Ideally the two interlock – wherever standard and application allow it.
The goal is a publishable base without wrong information – not completeness. Anything missing or that could go deeper: report it as "idea for later". We will keep expanding after go-live.
You go through your pages and report what is factually wrong. Expect three to five minutes per page.
Read the page like a customer, not like a proofreader – and only this page, not the ones it links to. Those are on someone else's list.
Report anything that stands out right here – a picture of the page is attached automatically. For a specific passage: select it, right-click, "Copy link to highlight", and paste the link into your report.
At the end click "Mark page as reviewed" – the button stays at the bottom of this panel. Even if you found nothing – otherwise "nothing reported" cannot be told apart from "never looked at". And also if you did report something: the tick means "looked at", not "free of errors".
If a page belongs to someone else's field: "Bring someone in" for a single spot, "Hand over page" for the whole page.
Your task list shows at any time what is yours, what is still open and what became of your reports.
Please report: Anything missing, outdated or wrong – and anything visibly broken.
Please don't report: Taste, wording polish, wishes. And that forms do not arrive: that is intentional.